Andy Lloyd's Dark Star Blog 22, January 2015

Andy Lloyd's Dark Star Blog

Blog 22 (January 2015)

The Shroud Hypothesis

The European Southern Observatory has released a fascinating image of a star field being obscured by a dense, dark nebula in the southern constellation Serpens Cauda called LDN 483 (1). It's a striking image, to be sure, looking at first glance as if there's a dark hole in the starlit sky (2). This is something of an optical illusion - the stars are still there, but the light from them has been blotted out by this immense dark molecular cloud, full of gas and dust which lies about 700 million light years away. This 'dark nebula' is, they tell us, the birthing ground of a new star effectively in its foetal stage of development, just prior to its light turning on.

This image has got me thinking, for several reasons. My interest is in finding a companion object to our Sun - a relatively cool, dark sub-stellar object known as a sub-brown dwarf which might still lurk way out there in the vast reaches of the outer solar system. If it exists, then it has yet to be detected by visible telescope surveys, and has evades two major infra-red sky surveys (IRAS and, more recently, WISE). Common sense would say that this object is unlikely, then, to exist. That said, indirect evidence that such an object may still lie undiscovered out there continues to crop up - much of which I have detailed in this series of monthly blogs, and on the ever-popular Dark Star Theory website for some years now. So, there's still something of a mystery here, acknowledged by quite a number of astronomers expert in the machinations of the outer solar system, whose modelling calls for another sizeable planet to explain the gaps in their data (3,4). The problem for all of us is this - where the hell is it?

If you're going to go about trying to find something, it helps to know exactly what it is you're looking for. Trying to find a missing planet seems pretty straightforward - you would imagine that it would reflect back some light from the Sun that we could see in telescopes. The smaller the planet, and the further away, the more difficult to detect. Right? Well, yes, but that is then made all the more tricky by acknowledging the fact that the luminosity of reflected light rapidly drops away with distance (by the fourth power), so that objects beyond the planet Neptune become very, very difficult to spot. Even so, a classic terrestrial planet calls for a light signature, however dim, that moves relatively rapidly across the backdrop of stars.

But what of a sub-stellar object - a dark, smouldering object more of the dimensions of the massive planet Jupiter? What do we know of such objects once they've become old, and lost their initial youthful light which is occasionally detected by hunters of these tiny sub-brown dwarfs? Well, really, not a lot. It's thought that brown dwarf 'stars' might be as numerous as 'normal' stars, but you wouldn't know it because they're damn tricky to spot. We can only assume that their properties follow along from the objects on either side of the planet/star spectrum.

If we are hunting for an object which leaves its mark here and there, but remains undetectable, then we might begin to wonder whether it is somehow hidden from view. Might it be wrapped up in a cloud of gas and dust that is as obscuring to its own light and heat as it is to the stars behind? If so, how could this come about?

Consider this: Active stars constantly emit a wind of charged particles that drives away the gas and dust that a condensing stellar nursery initially consists of. So, as the stars spark into life they not only emit vast amounts of bright new light, but their solar winds drive away the birthing waters that initially obscured their development. Let there be light...

Similarly, red dwarf and active brown dwarf stars also emit their own stellar winds, clearing volatiles away from their systems. By contrast, massive gas giants like Jupiter do not. So, logically there must be a cut-off point along the spectrum of planets and stars where sub-stellar objects stop firing our coronal mass ejections and the like, and thus stop sweeping their systems clear of volatiles.

It seems totally reasonable to me to assume that a Y Dwarf Dark Star would fall into this category.

However, when the Y Dwarf first formed, it would have been highly active and would have swept its lingering accretion clouds away. If our Dark Star is now surrounded by some kind of shroud of gas and dust, how and when did the shroud accumulate? I'll offer several scenarios:

Let's say that one or more of these scenarios might be correct. It follows then that the emitted heat (and any feeble light) from the Dark Star would be blocked by the obscuring cloud it finds itself immersed within. The system as a whole would be shrouded in darkness.

You might wonder why accumulating gas around such a massive body would not simply fall down into the Y Dwarf, and be consumed by it? This is exactly the same troublesome problem that astrophysicists have to deal with when discussing the origin of the solar system - why doesn't the protoplanetary disk simply get sucked into the forming Sun? Recent work has indicated that the system's strong magnetic field causes currents within the disk which prevent this outcome, helping to explain why some matter remains to go on to form planets (5). As such, the same effect would be true of a sub-brown dwarf, whose own magnetic field would be considerable. In the same way that a star's protoplanetary disk does not completely collapse into the emerging star, an accumulating cloud of dust and gas around an old sub-brown dwarf would also take hold as a distinct feature of the system.

One might imagine that such a scenario could account for an enormous quantity of interstellar and wide companion objects in the galaxy, providing us with an explanation for much missing mass out there. If such obscuring clouds commonly exist around old Y-dwarfs, then no one would ever know because the objects would effectively become invisible.

The coolest sub-Brown dwarfs

I have wondered in the past whether we should really be looking for a smouldering presence more like a dark cloud than just a planet or 'failed star'. But I have always assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that at the core of this dark aura of smog would be a more or less visible 'core'. Perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps the Dark Star system is wrapped in a dense shroud of gas and dust, rather like the dark Nebulae birthing pools. Any planet orbiting such a sub-brown dwarf would become a perfect hiding place from prying eyes. As long as this shrouded Dark Star does not intrude within about 80AU of the Sun, its accompanying gas cloud would be safe from the action of the solar wind. Nibiru, then, would be one of the outer worlds of the Dark Star system entering the planetary zone of the solar system as the Dark Star skirts its periphery, as I proposed in my 2005 book (6).

Image credit: ESO (1)

So, could LDN 483 itself be a densely obscuring smog surrounding the Sun's own Dark Star companion and its own planetary system? How do we really know that LDN 483 is a vast molecular cloud 700 million light years away, and not a tiny smog-veiled object in the outer solar system? There are a number of ways of determining an object's distance in space, most of which involve the measurement of properties of its light. But a Dark Nebula does not emit light, by definition, so astrophysicists would have to fall back on parallax effects to do with the seasonal movement of the Earth around the Sun (7). There is no reason to suppose that they have miscalculated with LDN 483 (sounds like a flight number, doesn't it?), which means that it should not be our Dark Star. But perhaps this does provide us with a clue as to what we might actually be looking for out there, and it's nothing like what astronomers have assumed so far.

There may already be evidence of an interaction between clouds of matter beyond the planetary zone with the Heliopause boundary. Studies of the properties of the Heliopause have indicated fluctuations over time, and NASA has suggested that the effect is due to 'interstellar fluff' surrounding the solar system (8, 9). There appears to be anomalous lack of uniformity in the boundary of our solar system, which may be attributable to the action of significant molecular clouds beyond. If these types of clouds have aggregated around a Dark Star over time, then they may provide us with a small, local nebula-like entity which is extremely difficult to spot.

Written by Andy Lloyd, 12th January 2015

References:

1) European Southern Observatory "The Dark Nebula LDN 483" 7 January 2015

eso.org article

2) Mark Prigg "Where did all the stars go? Astronomers reveal stunning image of giant ‘hole in the sky’ as mysterious dark cloud obscures view" 8 January 2015, with thanks to Mart

dailymail.co.uk article

3) Andy Lloyd "New Object in Outer Solar System Hints at Planet X" 27 March 2014

andylloyd.org/darkstarblog13.htm

4) Andy Lloyd "New Planets Await Discovery in the Inner Oort Cloud" 20 October 2014

andylloyd.org/darkstarblog19.htm

5) Jennifer Chu "A Strong Magnetic Field Shaped the Early Solar System" 14 November 2014

scitechdaily.com article

6) Andy Lloyd "Dark Star: The Planet X Evidence" Timeless Voyager Press, 2005

The Dark Star

7) How do you measure the distance from earth to a nebula?

answers.com article

8) Andy Lloyd "Heliopauses in Collision" 12 March 2014

andylloyd.org article

9) "Our Voyage Through the Local Interstellar Cloud -- "Different from the Chemical Make-up Our Solar System" 15th December 2014 (no longer available online), with thanks to Lee

New academic papers have recently been published highlighting the possible existence of perhaps two undiscovered Planet X objects (1). Once again, the calculations that are leading academic astronomers to this conclusion are based upon the orbital trajectories of the so-called extreme trans-Neptunian objects, or ETNOs. These appear to show a distinctly non-random set of orbital properties which in no way correlate with the way theory expects them to behave:

"Their paths must fulfil a series of characteristics: have a semi-major axis with a value close to 150 AU, an inclination of almost 0° and an argument or angle of perihelion also close to 0° or 180°. Yet what is observed in a dozen of these bodies is quite different: the values of the semi-major axis are very disperse [sic] (between 150 AU and 525 AU), the average inclination of their orbit is around 20° and argument of Perihelion -31°, without appearing in any case close to 180°." (2)

The ETNOS appear to be rambling way off the beaten path. The simplest explanation for this increasingly puzzling anomaly is that they are being shepherded by one or two large Planet X bodies well beyond the limits of the Kuiper Belt:

"The observed excess of objects reaching perihelion near the ascending node ... must be a true feature of this population [ETNOs] and its possible origin is explored in the framework of the Kozai effect. The analysis of several possible scenarios strongly suggest that at least two trans-Plutonian planets must exist." (3)

The Kozai effect relates to the gravitational perturbation that a large body exerts on the orbit of another much smaller and more distant object. The Spanish astronomers working on this problem used Jupiter's Kozai Effect influence over comet 96P/Machholz1 as a reference for how the mechanism might work for a proposed massive planet beyond Neptune (4).

So, if a massive Planet X object exists, it should influence the orbits of other far away objects in the solar system in a predictable and measurable way. Astrophysicists should therefore be able to work backwards from a set of data of perturbed objects, like the ETNOs, to figure out what unseen planets might be influencing their orbits. As time goes on, and more ETNOs are discovered and studied, then a clearer pattern should emerge about the nature of the perturbing influence.

(As an aside, it's interesting that the most massive planet in the solar system is being studied as a precedent for this calculation. The astronomers seem to be thinking big when it comes to Planet X!)

Up until fairly recently, it was totally unacceptable to suggest that there might exist a massive Planet X body beyond Neptune. Theory about how planetary systems form precluded the formation of such giant, outer worlds. But times change:

"The recent discovery by the ALMA radio telescope of a planet-forming disk more than 100 astronomical units from the star HL Tauri, which is younger than the Sun and more massive, suggests that planets can form several hundred astronomical units away from the centre of the system." (2)

The remarkable image of planets forming in the young protoplanetary disk of the star HL Tauri is fascinating, to be sure.

The disk is barely a million years old, but it is already clearly exhibiting the kinds of gaps emerging from the concentric rings of gas and dust that one would expect to see when planets form within the swirling dust clouds:

"“These features are almost certainly the result of young planet-like bodies that are being formed in the disc. This is surprising since such young stars are not expected to have large planetary bodies capable of producing the structures we see in this image,” said Stuartt Corder, ALMA Deputy Director.

1) Mike Wall "Mysterious Planet X May Really Lurk Undiscovered in Our Solar System" 16 January 2015 with thanks to Barry

2) "There Could be At Least Two Unknown Planets Hidden Well Beyond Pluto" 15 January 2015 (article on longer available online)

3) C. de la Fuente Marcos & R. de la Fuente Marcos "Extreme trans-Neptunian objects and the Kozai mechanism: signalling the presence of trans-Plutonian planets" Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 443 (1): L59-L63, 1 September 2014

4) C. de la Fuente Marcos, et al. "Flipping minor bodies: what comet 96P/Machholz 1 can tell us about the orbital evolution of extreme trans-Neptunian objects and the production of near-Earth objects on retrograde orbits", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446(2): 1867-1873, 2015

5) Astronomy Now "Planet-forming disc around young star revealed in unprecedented detail" 6 November 2014

6) N. Lodieu et al. "Binary frequency of planet-host stars at wide separations: A new brown dwarf companion to a planet-host star" Astronomy and Astrophysics, 569, September 2014,

Last month, I discussed the new scientific findings about the water carried by comets. The sheer lack of ice on comets, compared to what had been assumed previously, and the differing isotopic ratio of the water from that on Earth has severely challenged the 'late veneer theory', which argued that the Earth's oceans were provided by impacting comets over billions of years (1).

It had also been assumed that a lot of the meteoritic debris that falls to the Earth represented the leftover building blocks of the solar system, including many of the comets and asteroids, the latter of which are heavily composed of chondrites:

"Chondrites were formed by the accretion of particles of dust and grit present in the primitive Solar System which gave rise to asteroids over 4.55 billion years ago. These asteroid parent bodies of chondrites are (or were) small to medium sized asteroids that were never part of any body large enough to undergo melting and planetary differentiation." (2)

However, this view is now changing, too. Scientists are now thinking that the origins of much of this debris were violent in nature, giving us a new view of the early solar system as a far more catastrophic place than had previously been thought (3,4).

"Chondrules are the millimetre-scale, previously molten, spherules found in most meteorites... An impact origin for chondrules implies that meteorites are a byproduct of planet formation rather than leftover building material." (5)

The clear implication of this is that chondrules formed from the violent impacts of massive bodies in the solar system which, a priori, were already in existence. Far from being the initial building blocks, they were created by a violent process involving proto-planets that were already extant in the solar system. Once again, this finding moves us towards an appreciation of the catastrophic nature of the early solar system, and the many questions which remain about how planets form, and die.

The asteroids, and possibly also some of the comets, appear to have formed from the by-products of massive cosmic collisions. This sits well with the cosmology of the early solar system proposed by author Zecharia Sitchin, who wrote that a titanic collision between a watery planet orbiting between Mars and Jupiter and a sizeable rogue planet on an elliptical trajectory around the Sun resulted in the asteroid belt and many of the comets (6). Far from being building blocks, as previously thought, they are the scattered remains of a violent incident billions of years ago.

3) SciTechDaily "Meteorites Were Byproducts of Planetary Formation, Not Building Blocks" 15 January 2015, with thanks to Mark

4) Jennifer Chu "A twist on planetary origins: New study finds meteorites were byproducts of planetary formation, not building blocks." 14 January 2015

5) Brandon Johnson et al "Impact jetting as the origin of chondrules", Nature, 517: 339–341, 14 January 2015

Some Bad Boy stars could be hanging around our stellar neighbourhood in the next million years or so, potentially causing trouble (1). The galaxy is a dynamic place, with stars acting more like cross-country runners skirting around a hill than stadium athletes running around a track. Trying to work out where the runners are heading is not easy task, but Dr Bailer-Jones of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg has made use of super-computer calculations to try to foresee the celestial future.

The results should worry anyone planning on living for the next million years or so:

"The star that is set to come closest is called Hip 85605, and has a 90 per cent chance of reaching between 0.13 and 0.65 light years away from us in the next quarter to half a million years – although its current position data isn't entirely clear so the estimate may be wrong. The next closest is GL 710, which has a 90 per cent chance of reaching 0.32 to 1.44 light years in the next 1.3 million years.

Of course, this need not concern us unduly. But the modelling does serve to show how passing stars might have affected the solar system and, in particular, its extended Oort Cloud of comets in the past. This offers an alternative explanation for non-random perturbation effects calculated for long-period comets visiting from the outer Oort Cloud. The new Monte Carlo calculations firm up past fly-bys of stars, too:

"A larger perturbation may have been caused by gamma Microscopii, a G6 giant with a mass of about 2.5 Msol, which came within 0.35-1.34 pc (90% confidence interval) around 3.8 Myr ago." (3)

This turns out to be a shorter distance (~1.14-4.37 light years) from the Sun than previously calculated back in 2001:

"Backwards extrapolation of the motion of γ Microscopii has shown that approximately 3.8 million years ago, it was only around 6 light-years from the Sun." (4)

Which means that it's possible that the star Gamma Microscopii, which is over twice the mass of the Sun, actually moved through the Sun's own comet clouds in the period leading up to the Quaternary Ice Epoch/Pleistocene 2.5 million years ago; an era that saw major geophysical changes and the eventual emergence of humanity. Might there be a link?

1) Andrew Griffin "End of the world: Humans could be killed off by hail of comets from passing stars" 5 January 2015, with thanks to Lee

2) Jacob Aron "Star's flying visit could fling comets at Earth" 17 December 2014

4) J. García-Sánchez, et al "Stellar encounters with the solar system", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 379 (2): 634–659, 2001

Around the same time as Dark Star was published, there was another book along similar lines published by Walter Cruttenden (2) that considered an even larger companion object (about 80Mj I think). He ended up accepting that the proposition would not work (it would be a visible star, in reality). Nonetheless, his proposal initially suggested that the very same effect that I think you're discussing was apparent as Earth's Precession of the Equinoxes. This wobble provides a scribing of one degree of arc every 72 years, which is double the figure you suggest. If Cruttenden is right in at least the suggestion of the effect being a Dark Star causal mechanism, then that would give us a data point that could be one step further towards suggesting its position.

"Hello Andy,

I've attached a paper I wrote recently on the dark star to be published very soon on a friend's web site (4). It goes into detail on the ideas I mentioned in my earlier note, in particular on the role of angular momentum in the solar system. Well known by astronomers is that the Sun has over 99.9% of the mass of the solar system but less than 4% of its angular momentum. Astronomy has a tortured answer for this, which strains credibility. On the other hand I think the dark star can solve the mystery, which I explain in detail in the paper. I analyze several different orbits for the dark star including Mr. Cruttenden's proposed orbit of 25000 / 26000 years.

Regarding Mr's Cruttenden's theory that the dark star might be connected to the precession of the Earth's axis (i.e. the equinoxes), I'm afraid he's off base. Precession of spinning tops, of which the earth is a very large example, is very well understood by physics. Tops precess because of a force acting on the top along a line different from that of the top's spin axis. In the case of the Earth's precession, the gravity of the Sun and Moon provide the necessary force and the Earth's tilt provides the skewed angular deviation. Many complex papers have been written about this but I like this easy-to-read explanation by a physics professor at Northwestern University who explains the details and derives the rate much more clearly than most (5).

That said, you do have an interesting point, however. Even though the gravity of the Sun and Moon account for the Great Year, there is another very subtle effect that comes into play. If there is a dark star orbiting the Sun then both bodies are actually in orbit about their common center of mass as we know. The Sun then moves in an orbit in space as well and has a centripetal force acting on it that's proportional to the square of its angular velocity, which would also contribute to the precession except that it's so very tiny that it essentially gets lost. But even though the force is very slight an extremely sensitive gyroscope should be able to sense it if the dark star's period isn't too large, which would prove the existence of your dark star.

As you'll see from my paper I believe this dark star, probably a brown dwarf, has already been detected at about 50 billion miles out. The evidence for this is explained in the first section.

The paper explains all this in more detail. Your thoughts are very much appreciated.

Kind regards, Robert F." (6)

~~*~~

Hi Robert,

Thanks for your email, which I find myself very much in agreement with, and also the attached document which contained many fascinating discussion points regarding scenarios presented by Sitchin, Warmkessel, Muller and several others. The detail that you have presented about the potential missing angular momentum, and how that compares with studies of various accretion disks was particularly helpful I thought.

The main problem we all face is the glaring issue of why such an object has yet evaded detection. IRAS came up with some hints of objects out there, and a case can be made that the American part of the group studying the pertinent IRAS data fumbled the ball back in the mid-1980s. But WISE really should have done a better job, particularly given the improvement in the resolution of their imagery, and the computing power this more modern search brought to bear. However, candidate objects from WISE seem sparse indeed, even for possibilities involving the outer Oort Cloud. Matese and Whitmire have presented just a few possibilities from their trawls through the data (7).

7) Matese and Whitmire "Searching the WISE Preliminary Catalog for Massive Planets in the Oort Cloud" EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011

I recently shared a discussion by email with a Planet X researcher called Terral Croft, focussed upon a variation of the Dark Star concept that he has been working on and blogging about online for about five years (since the advent of Comet Elenin) (1). He calls this object a 'Black Star' (a "collapsed binary twin to our Sun that is something between a black dwarf and neutron-type star that releases no light in the visible or infrared spectrum" (2)). He believes that it is currently moving through the planetary zone of the solar system, based upon a raft of evidence bringing together an uptick in seismic and other geophysical changes, anomalous meteorological events, and various anomalies within the solar system, gathered together succinctly in this subsequent email:

"What could possibly cause the heliosphere to shrink 25 percent in just the last 10 years 'and' weaken Earth magnetosphere proportionately 'and' cause 6 to 8-magnitude earthquake values to go parabolic 'and' cause Jupiter's core to liquefy 'and' create Saturn's recent super storms moving through Cancer/Leo 'and' turn Earth magnetosphere around for 28 hours (3.12-13.2012) and do that one year and one day 'after' Fukushima (3.11.2011) and cause the associated Earth Axis Shift 11 days in the year 'after' the 8.8 Chile Quake (2.27.2010) causing another large Earth Axis Shift 'and' cause massive northern ice sheet depletion 'and' ocean conveyor disruption 'and' jet stream fluctuations leading to strange weather anomalies 'and' mass animal deaths at predictable times 'and' magnetic North Pole migration using a series of predictable path loops 'and' explain higher numbers of comets, asteroids, meteors/fireballs falling out of orbit 'and' a seismic pattern going back to 1965 'and' predictable earth change upticks/lulls 'and' the recent global sinkhole uptick 'and' explain bipolar condition in humans multiplying 40 times since 2003 'and' the recent global volcanic uptick 'and' lettered agency psyops using Elenin and ISON Comets claimed to be 'controlled' representing the first two hyperbolic comets discovered by Russians 'and' explain Mars' broken magnetic portal connection/missing magnetosphere, Venus' slowing retrograde rotation, Uranus' robust seismicity, global warming and warming of all the planets in the solar system, Solar Cycle 24 flat lining at the end of 2011 'and' the earth change events connected to the accounts of Noah 'and' Moses that coincide with the Nibiru orbit period from the Sumerian Tablets 'and' the prophecies of Jesus Christ from Matthew 24 (Joel 2) and Revelation (Wormwood) 'and' just for starters? Replacing the 'and' with 'or' creates a wide spectrum of probabilities, but all of these symptoms together at the same time allows us to eliminate the impossible and improbable to find the truth.

"My question to you is: What can possibly create all of these symptoms except the near proximity of an invisible star? My answer is nothing, leading to my conclusion that the Black/Dark Star is much nearer than many realize. You mentioned that your Dark Star would be located in the same position, as Earth moves in natural orbit around the Sun. However, the evidence says we have a clear seismic pattern where the celestial/invisible star-like object is moving 'left' in the orbit diagram (prograde) at a rate of 5.5 degrees for every 188 days (2010-11) and that rate is INCREASING to indicate our Black Star is reaching perihelion. This object cannot possibly be very far away from Earth 'and' move with this velocity through the ecliptic constellations. My feeling is that you will draw similar conclusions, but only if you take the time to actually gather all the evidence to formulate and prove the hypothesis right or wrong; allowing us the opportunity to draw the right conclusions about what is happening all around us. The obvious truth for me is that we are dealing with a spiritual entity that is actively masking these truths and evidence that has been hidden deliberately in plain sight. So far, the evidence indicates that the Marshall Masters, Keith Hunters and James McCanneys of the world look at a very small part of the evidence with little or no desire to invest the time for running a real Project Black/Dark Star investigation and all the related evidence." (3)

Although Terral published our correspondence up until this point on his monthly newsletter (4), he has not yet included my next reply, outlining some of the issues that challenge his hypothesis (sent 2nd January 2015). Here's what I said:

We had a further exchange of emails along similar lines, which helped to clarify a few things, and I invited Terral to make some predictions about how the object he has described might affect the Earth in the future. He sent me this correspondence, which outlines what he thinks is likely to come to pass in the next six months or so:

"Thank you for writing and, yes, sharing. I appreciate hearing your views very much. Earth passed between the Sun and Black Star around the second to third week of April 2014, when we had an 8-magnitude quake, six 7-magnitude quakes and seventeen 6-magnitude quake events in a 19-day period. Earth crossed Black Star Orbit Path on May 20, 2014 for the magnetic North Pole to reach the bottom of the recent path loop farthest from Siberia on May 21, 2014. Earth moved to outside-orbit position making the right triangle with the Black Star relative to the Sun around the third week of July 2014 to begin the back orbit phase of the 2014 Earth Orbit Cycle that marked the 'low' value of 2.5 to 4-magnitude earthquakes at 177 (high cycle value was 536); just one quake different from the week of January 5, 2014 marking the start of the 2014 Earth Orbit Cycle. Earth passed behind the Sun relative to the Black Star amid another flurry of X-class flares on November 15, 2014 to begin the current earth change lull period that will end around the first of February 2015 to begin the next orbit cycle. Then a massive earth change uptick period will begin, until Earth again passes between the Sun and Black Star in the month of May 2015.

"There is a disparity between the nearside and backside alignments that is yet to be understood, but look for many high-magnitude quake events for the month of May 2015 very close together; as the Earth once again passes between the two binary twin stars with another round of fluctuations in Earth magnetosphere; as the heliosphere and magnetosphere continue to weaken from nearing Black Star proximity and rising percentage of Sun/Black Star magnetic portal inner active conduits. The primary Sun/Black Star magnetic portal connection will have reduced insulation properties, as inner active portal conduits become increasingly pressurized to grow in diameter forcing the smaller passive conduits to the exterior for increased Sun/Earth/Black Star portal-to-portal cross firing creating inner solar system environmental conditions conducive to large X-class solar flare generation; as the Sun interprets increased electromagnetic cloud influences as foreign inbound bodies to launch defense countermeasures. Hopefully we are not looking at a Black Star/Earth crossing event anytime soon, but we are running out of space in the orbit diagram for this to take very much longer; as the nearside alignment quake events are converging on the Earth/Black Star crossing date indicating that the Black Stat (sic) has arrived.

2) Correspondence from Terral Croft, 31 December 2014. Note this entry for 'Black Dwarf' on Wikipedia: